Friday, February 3, 2012

An "infinite" person

An "infinite" person- from my Arts and Humanities: 20th Century and Beyond class
Our text defines an infinite person as one who commits no crimes against humanity, is free of rigid prejudices and does not jump to quick conclusions or judgments (Janaro & Altshuler, 2009, p. 18). For me this means someone who is unstained by society, someone who is at peace in chaos and can openly accept and love another despite their differences and/or failures. I believe we all begin this way with a pureness in spirit and an insatiable thirst to learn and grow. The most important trait, in my opinion, is being wholly open minded, considering all angles and knowing that even though you’ve considered all angles in your mind there are always those pieces that are unseen and unknown. In pursuing any goal this is significant to move forward. Judgment has an end, ceasing forward growth. Openness allows for improvement and growth. 
 
Reference-
Janaro, R. & Altshuler, T. (2009). The Art of Being Human: The Humanities as a Technique for Living. New York, NY: Pearson Longman

"All kids have tremendous talents & we squander them"

Sharing an essay I wrote for my Art and Humanities: Twentieth Century and Beyond class-


Do you think Robinson makes a good case for creativity? What are some of the strong points in the lecture, and what could use more development? What are some ways that creativity had an impact on your past and could impact your future?

Robinson (2006) shares his thoughts on children’s “capacity for innovation”, stating that “creativity is as important as literacy” and emphasizing the need to “educate the whole being”. Having studied child development, thankfully before I had children, this concept then was an eye opener to me. I consider us extremely blessed to have a charter school that uses arts integrated curriculum that my children attend (http://www.artspacecharter.org/). Robinson (2006) points out that our education system was designed “to meet the needs of industry” through “academic inflation” children are “educated out of creativity”. The strong point of the lecture for me was his story about Gillian Lynne, how she struggled in school and her teachers suspected a learning disorder. He points out how present day she would have likely been diagnosed with ADHD. A specialist, after observing her behavior, rightfully told her mother, “Mrs. Lynne, Gillian isn't sick; she's a dancer. Take her to a dance school" (Robinson, 2006). In a child development class years ago I learned of a study in which kids were given paperclips and asked how many ways they could use them. According to Stephens (2011), “1,500 kindergartners between 3 and 5 years old were given a divergent thinking test. Divergent thinking tests don’t measure creativity, but rather one’s propensity for creativity. The test asks questions such as “How many ways could you use this paperclip?” … Ninety-eight percent of kindergartners tested at the genius level”. In contrast to this Stephens (2011) points out, “after five years of formal education, only 50 percent of children tested at the genius level”.

In my personal life I can remember back to high school where I thrived in Art. I struggled with all other areas of education but Art class made me feel accomplished because it was something I enjoyed, did well and was praised for. Today, as an adult… I no longer thrive in Art, I now struggle with it. I can no longer create the things that at one time flowed naturally without considerable determination. Even with determination the outcome does not meet the beauty of the works I created without a thought as a child. Pertaining to how creativity has and will continue to have an impact on my future, I feel that it takes quite a bit of creativity to think critically. As an RN I am called on to think outside the box in order to provide holistic care for my patients. On a more personal level, as a mother I often times call on what’s left of my creative side when raising my children. Without the ability to abstractly think, my life with children would be far more difficult and not very enjoyable J


Stephens, D., J. (2011). Innovations: The case against college. The Washington Post. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/on-innovations/the-case-against-college/2011/08/17/gIQAYy3ILJ_story.html


Robinson, K. (2006, February). Ken Robinson says schools kill creativity [Video file]. Retrieved from http://www.ted.com/talks/ken_robinson_says_schools_kill_creativity.html